|
Historical Figure Paper Rubric |
Great Enigma Debate - Home - Unit 2 Outline
| Introduction
and Thesis |
·
Essay
controlled by clear, precise, well-defined thesis: is sophisticated in
both statement and insight ·
Identifies
historical figure’s views in a clear, concise and complete manner |
·
Clear,
specific, argumentative thesis central to the essay; may have left minor
terms undefined ·
Describes
historical figure’s views |
·
General
thesis or controlling idea; may not define several central terms |
·
Thesis
vague or not central to argument; central terms not define |
| Main Points
and Body Paragraphs |
·
Well
developed main points directly related to the thesis. ·
Supporting
examples are concrete and detailed. ·
Driven
by broad, comprehensive review of primary and secondary research |
·
Three
or more main points are related to the thesis, but one may lack details.
·
Primary
and secondary research are apparent |
·
Three
or more main points are present. ·
Primary
and secondary research are encyclopedic and superficial |
·
Poor
development of ideas. ·
The
narrative is undeveloped, and tells rather than shows, the story. ·
Research
cursory |
| Structure |
·
Appropriate,
clear and smooth transitions; arrangement of paragraphs seems
particularly appropriate |
·
Distinct
units of thought in paragraphs controlled by specific and detailed topic
sentences; clear transitions between developed, cohering, and logically
arranged paragraphs that are internally cohesive |
·
Some
awkward transitions; some brief, weakly unified or undeveloped
paragraphs; arrangement may not appear entirely natural; contains
extraneous information |
·
Simplistic,
tends to narrate or merely summarize; wanders from one topic to another;
illogical arrangement of ideas |
| Mechanics |
·
Writing
is smooth, skillful, coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive
with varied structure. Words are well chosen. ·
The essay has
few, if any, spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, or usage
errors. |
·
Writing
is clear and sentences have varied structure. |
·
Writing
is clear, but sentences may lack variety. ·
A
few errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization. (3-4) |
·
Writing
is confusing, hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on
sentences. ·
Distracting
errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization. |